NAHB BUILDING WALL TEST
SPRAY FOAM INSULATION ADDS UP TO 300% SHEAR STRENGTH TO
THE STRUCTURE
Introduction
The NAHB Building Wall Test was initiated by the Polyurethane
Foam Structural Quality Assessment Committee of The Society
of the Plastics Industry, Inc. in March 1992. The objective
was to establish the structural value of spray in place
polyurethane foam used in wood frame wall constructions.
The original plan called for three phases. The first was
a paper review of all available data, the second was laboratory
evaluation and the third was full model testing.
Objectives
The original plan intended to quantify the structural value
quality of the sprayed polyurethane foam (SPF). The tests
were to show that the sprayed polyurethane foam could replace
building components such as studs, sheathing and corner
bracing. The National Assn. Of Home Builder's Research Center
was selected to carry out the plan. It was determined that
tests would be performed for racking (shear) resistance
and also for compressive (axial) resistance. A total of
45 panels would be built using different configurations.
Racking (Shear)
This test evaluates the resistance of the wall construction
to wind forces on the wall. Conventional construction of
walls requires bracing using panels or diagonal bracing
straps. Thirty racking panels were constructed. Eighteen
of these were filled with sprayed polyurethane foam (SPF).
For comparison, twelve control panels were constructed without
SPF. These panels were built using 2x 4" and were 8
ft. high by 8 ft. wide. Half inch, 4 ft. x 8 ft. sheet rock
was installed horizontally on the panel with the seam taped
and finished. The conventional panels used half inch fiberboard
sheathing or half-inch plywood on the exterior walls. As
compared to the panels without foam or sheathing: the foam
filled panels were 300% higher in pounds of resistance for
the wood siding (T1-11) and 200% higher for the vinyl panels.
This clearly proves that sprayed polyurethane foam adds
racking strength to wall panels.
Compressive (Axial)
The second test that was performed is designed to determine
if the PF would add any strength to the compressive capabilities
of the wall construction. The axial test measures the resistance
of panels to a compressive load as would be imposed by the
dead or live loads of overhead floors or roofs carried by
the walls. The wall strength in this test comes from the
stud spacing and the sheathing materials. Adhesion of all
the construction elements is important to the overall strength
of these test panels. Again both wood and vinyl siding were
used without sheathing for the sprayed polyurethane foam.
The test was for 16" on center and also 24" on
center studs. Each stud spacing variation was done with
the vinyl and wood siding.
The values of the wood siding with sprayfoam
were very similar for the 16" and 24" on center
studs. This shows importance of adhesion for the strength
values. The 16" vs. 24" on center stud values for
vinyl were not as close. The increase stud spacing showed
lower strength values. This can probably be attributed to
the building paper (felt) that was used between the foam and
the vinyl siding.
Summary
The test has positively shown that the sprayed polyurethane
foam adds strength to the wood frame wall panel. The racking
test shows that the foam/wood siding material can be as strong
or stronger than the conventional plywood panel/fiberboard
sheathing construction technique. Special bracing for wind
resistance would not be required for strength purposed when
using sprayed polyurethane foam in the wall. The 16"
o.c. stud spacing using SPF in the walls without sheathing
comes very close to the values of conventional panels when
tested for compressive (axial) strength. The use of sprayed
polyurethane foam can become a major factor in reducing the
cost of wood frame construction by allowing 2 x 6 replacement
with 2 x 4's.